As students and educators, we seek to understand the world and to share our understanding with others through a practice of critical thinking and responsible action. Therefore, we cannot remain silent as Tennessee plans to execute people in the name of justice.
We call upon Governor Bill Haslam to suspend all scheduled executions immediately, and to commission a full and transparent review of capital punishment in Tennessee.
A 2007 American Bar Association report on Tennessee’s death penalty laws, procedures, and practices found that “the State of Tennessee fails to comply or is only in partial compliance” with its basic recommendations. These include the following areas for reform:
- Inadequate Procedures to Address Innocence Claims
- Geographical Disparities in Tennessee’s Capital Sentencing
- Excessive Caseloads of Defense Counsel
- Racial Disparities in Tennessee’s Capital Sentencing
These issues have not been resolved in the current system. For example:
- Since 2012, three men on Tennessee’s death row have had their convictions overturned: Ndume Olatushani (Nashville Scene), Timothy McKinney (Democracy Now), Michael Rimmer (USA Today). The state has officially exonerated three people: Michael McCormick (2007, after 20 years on death row), Paul House (2009, after 23 years on death row), and Gussie Vann (2011, after 17 years on death row) (DPIC).
- There are persistent geographical disparities in capital sentencing. For example, more than a third of all death sentences in Tennessee arise in just one county: Shelby County (Memphis – only 14% of the population of Tennessee) (The Nation).
- In Shelby County, public defenders have caseloads that are 3 to 4 times higher than the national average (ACLU).
- African Americans make up approximately 43% of Tennessee’s death row population but only 17% of the state’s total population (TADP).
In addition to these ongoing structural flaws in Tennessee’s death penalty, we now face new issues concerning the method of execution:
- In 2011, Tennessee and several other states had to turn over their supplies of sodium thiopental, one of the drugs in the three-drug execution protocol, because of the circumstances under which it was acquired (New York Times).
- A lawsuit was brought against the FDA for allowing the drug to be imported by state corrections departments without proper inspection and approval (Death Penalty Info).
- This year, Tennessee switched from a three-drug protocol (involving sodium thiopental) to a new one-drug protocol (pentobarbital). But it is not clear how the state intends to secure a supply of the new execution drug. Neither drug is manufactured in the US, and pharmaceutical companies based in the European Union have banned the use of their products for state execution (The Tennessean).
- This year, Tennessee legislators passed a law that allows compounding pharmacies to mix drugs without a prescription (NPR). This law would permit the state to order execution drugs directly from a compounding pharmacy in Tennessee, bypassing EU trade restrictions.
- In April 2013, Tennessee legislators amended a law guaranteeing confidentiality to any “person or entity involved in the procurement or provision of chemicals, equipment, supplies and other items for use in carrying out a sentence of death” (TCA Section 10-7-504(h)(1)). This means that a compounding pharmacy in Tennessee could accept a contract to produce execution drugs without disclosing its name to the public.
This series of events raises many ethical, political, and practical questions: How can we be sure that execution drugs prepared by a compounding pharmacy would not produce unconstitutional pain and suffering? Doesn’t the public have a right to know who is making the drugs used to execute people in our name? And why are we using drugs otherwise meant to heal people in order to kill them?
There are also enduring ethical, political, religious, and practical reasons to oppose state execution:
- Those of us who identify as people of faith demand the suspension or the abolition of the death penalty in Tennessee because our faith in the God of life compels us to seek justice that is truly equitable and that restores to life that which has been broken. As people who bear witness to the power of healing, we call upon the Governor to set about healing the demonstrably wounded and wounding death penalty system in Tennessee. Because Governor Haslam is also a person of faith who believes in the God who fosters life and who asks us to do the same, we ask that he halt and address the problems in this current system that foster neither justice nor life.
- Since 1976, over 140 people have been exonerated and freed from death row in the US. That’s one innocent person for every ten people who have been executed. How many more innocent people have we executed, and how many are still slated for execution? (One For Ten)
- 88% of leading criminologists in the US do not believe that the death penalty is an effective means of deterrence. This view is supported by empirical evidence; for example, the murder rate in death penalty states is consistently higher than the murder rate in non-death penalty states (Death Penalty Information Center).
- Many people across the political spectrum believe that the death penalty fails to provide closure for the family members of murder victims (Conservatives Concerned about the Death Penalty, Murder Victims’ Families for Human Rights, TADP). Some Tennesseans, such as Hector Black, have found peace through restorative justice after the loss of a beloved member to murder (NPR).
- No one knows how much the death penalty costs in Tennessee because a full study has never been conducted in this state. But in other states, death sentences have proven to be far more expensive than other sentences for first degree murder, and we have no reason to believe that our state expenditures would be significantly different. For example, a 2008 study in Maryland showed that a death penalty case (including investigation, trial, appeals, and incarceration) cost an average of $3 million; that’s $1.9 million more expensive than non-death penalty cases (TADP and Death Penalty Information Center). Taxpayers in Tennessee have the right to know how much it costs to maintain the death penalty. Couldn’t we use money saved from stopping executions to open cold cases and to address the social conditions that drive violence and crime?
For these and other reasons, we call upon the Governor to halt executions until we can be sure that the system is working in the service of justice rather than against it.
As students and educators who seek to foster critical thinking and responsible action, some of us believe the death penalty should be abolished, while others believe it should be suspended until systemic flaws are fully addressed. But we stand united in our critical opposition to the death penalty as it is currently practiced in Tennessee.
To view the signatories of this letter, click here.
If you are a student or educator in Tennessee, and you would like to add your signature to this open letter, click here.
If you are not student or educator in Tennessee, but you would like to support the open letter, please sign this petition.